// CC sparse people.
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 07:05:49PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Andrew.
>
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 06:46:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I believe sizeof(bool) can vary between compilers (on gcc it's 1) but
> > that doesn't matter here.
>
> Looking at the warning, I originally suspected that maybe the standard
> was crazy enough to allow mixed usages of different sizes for bool as
> the compiler sees fit. Just scanned the spec, nothing that insane.
> It's a proper integeral type, so I'm now more puzzled why sparse is
> warning about sizeof(bool).
>
> > sizeof(enum) can vary between compilers as well. In fact I've seen a
> > compiler which used 2 if the enumerated values were 0..65535, and 4
> > otherwise. So warning about sizeof(enum) would be a bit more useful
> > than about sizeof(bool).
>
> Oh yeah, gcc does that too. If the enum definition contains a number
> larger than 32bit, it'll grow it to 64bit.
>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> enum { ENUM_A = 1LU };
> enum { ENUM_B = 1LU << 31 };
> enum { ENUM_C = 1LU << 32 };
>
> int main(void)
> {
> printf("%zu %zu %zu\n", sizeof(ENUM_A), sizeof(ENUM_B),
> sizeof(ENUM_C));
> return 0;
> }
>
> $ ./a.out
> 4 4 8
>
> Whether sparse should trigger a warning on it, I don't know.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
