On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote:
> ... as stipulated by the Hardware Specification document.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
I think you need Ulf (as ux500 clock author) and Loic (as PRCMU
developer) to have a look at this.
> -enum prcmu_clock {
> - PRCMU_SGACLK,
(...)
> +#define ARMCLK 0
> +#define PRCMU_ACLK 1
(...)
It seems the enum and the defines want to do two different things?
The first is a kernel-internal representation of the clocks, whereas
the latter is a HW-centric representation for a certain PRCMU
variant (I guess?)
Does one actually exclude the other?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
