3.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Christian Gmeiner <[email protected]> commit 4b949b8af12e24b8a48fa5bb775a13b558d9f4da upstream. During the development of this driver an in-house register documentation was used. The last week some integration tests were done and this problem was found. It turned out that the released register documentation is wrong. The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one. Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <[email protected]> Cc: Bryan Wu <[email protected]> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c @@ -47,37 +47,37 @@ static struct ot200_led leds[] = { { .name = "led_1", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(7), + .mask = BIT(6), }, { .name = "led_2", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(6), + .mask = BIT(5), }, { .name = "led_3", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(5), + .mask = BIT(4), }, { .name = "led_4", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(4), + .mask = BIT(3), }, { .name = "led_5", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(3), + .mask = BIT(2), }, { .name = "led_6", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(2), + .mask = BIT(1), }, { .name = "led_7", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(1), + .mask = BIT(0), } }; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
