The patch seems right, but the title is wrong: this is not a error recovery
path.
Also, the description is missing again.
Jerome
On 06/03/2013 05:42 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang....@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
> index 3d90344..66cf28a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -272,8 +272,6 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct
> bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
>
> if (page_zero_filled(uncmem)) {
> kunmap_atomic(user_mem);
> - if (is_partial_io(bvec))
> - kfree(uncmem);
> zram->stats.pages_zero++;
> zram_set_flag(meta, index, ZRAM_ZERO);
> ret = 0;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
