On Mon, 14 May 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > + /* XXX: dynamic free target is complicated and may be wrong... */
> > int freetarget = freepages.high + inactive_target / 3;
>
> I think its better if we just remove " + inactive_target / 3" here ---
> callers already account for the inactive_target when trying to
> calculate the free target anyway.
Right, there's really only one thing this "+ inactive_target / 3"
achieves ... more agressive flushing of dirty pages, by trying to
keep a larger free target.
Whether this is good or not I really don't know; this basically
boils down to the old "pre-flushing vs. delaying IO" thing.
regards,
Rik
--
Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
