On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 10:28 +0800, Michael Wang wrote: > On 05/28/2013 01:05 PM, Michael Wang wrote: > > wake-affine stuff is always trying to pull wakee close to waker, by theory, > > this will bring benefit if waker's cpu cached hot data for wakee, or the > > extreme ping-pong case. > > > > And testing show it could benefit hackbench 15% at most. > > > > However, the whole stuff is somewhat blindly and time-consuming, some > > workload therefore suffer. > > > > And testing show it could damage pgbench 50% at most. > > > > Thus, wake-affine stuff should be smarter, and realise when to stop > > it's thankless effort. > > Is there any comments?
(I haven't had time to test-drive yet, -rt munches time like popcorn) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
