On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:32:10AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote: > Hmm, since the changes in the onliner patches are either hard effort > to find in reviewing/testing or more or less related to the new > implementation, I better prefer to keep authorship as well to document > the code development (don't blame me about patch count ;)). We better > should add a branch (preferable at topic branch in tip?) as soon as > possible for this.
Yes, you should definitely keep authorship - simply state this in the commit message, add your SOB, etc. However, I don't want to have messy history for patches which haven't been reviewed yet. This complicates review needlessly and makes absolutely no sense for later when you stare at the history. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
