There's no need to add self to waitqueue if doing a nonblock read. This could help to avoid the spinlock contention.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> --- drivers/net/macvtap.c | 7 +++++-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c index 59e9605..2395062 100644 --- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c +++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c @@ -845,7 +845,9 @@ static ssize_t macvtap_do_read(struct macvtap_queue *q, struct kiocb *iocb, ssize_t ret = 0; while (len) { - prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + if (!noblock) + prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait, + TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); /* Read frames from the queue */ skb = skb_dequeue(&q->sk.sk_receive_queue); @@ -867,7 +869,8 @@ static ssize_t macvtap_do_read(struct macvtap_queue *q, struct kiocb *iocb, break; } - finish_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait); + if (!noblock) + finish_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait); return ret; } -- 1.7.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/