On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 13:08 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com> writes: > > > Why not "text:%#lx" as already used in this string? It's > > equivalent to "0x%lx". > > Well, I don't know the reasoning in this case, but I'd like to note that > those are not strictly equivalent. Personally I find the formatting of 0 > annoying enough to avoid %#x for any value which may be 0. It's > especially bad if you try to line up things by adding leading zeros.
Yep, I found that 0x%lx produced the same output as %p. If you'd rather I use something else instead, I'm happy to update the patch. Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
