On Mon, 27 May 2013 09:27:42 +0800 Zhang Yanfei <zhangyan...@cn.fujitsu.com> 
wrote:

> ___ 2013___05___27___ 09:27, HATAYAMA Daisuke ______:
> > (2013/05/26 9:58), Zhang Yanfei wrote:
> >> ___ 2013___05___26___ 07:20, Eric W. Biederman ______:
> >>> Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei....@gmail.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>>> From: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyan...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >>>
> >>> Won't we want to keep this reservation around to so that this number
> >>> doesn't get reused, and cause people confusion when
> >>> upgrading/downgrading kernels?
> >>
> >> Ah, yes. I will just keep this and add a note to make people know that
> >> it is removed in the next version.
> >>
> > 
> > It looks enough writing "obsolete" according to the other parts of the same 
> > file.
> > 
> 
> I've sent the v2 version and actually did what you said.

I can't find any v2 version of this patchset.

I did this:

--- a/Documentation/devices.txt~dev-oldmem-remove-the-interface-fix
+++ a/Documentation/devices.txt
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ Your cooperation is appreciated.
                                        export the buffered printk records.
                 12 = /dev/oldmem       Used by crashdump kernels to access
                                        the memory of the kernel that crashed.
+                                       (obsolete)
 
   1 block      RAM disk
                  0 = /dev/ram0         First RAM disk
_

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to