On Sun, 13 May 2001, Richard Gooch wrote:
> Larry McVoy writes:
> > Ha. For once you're both wrong but not where you are thinking. One
> > of the few places that I actually hacked Linux was for exactly this
> > - it was in the 0.99 days I think. I saved the list of I/O's in a
> > file and filled the buffer cache with them at next boot. It
> > actually didn't help at all.
>
> Maybe you did something wrong :-)
How about "the data loads got instrumented, but the metadata
loads which caused over half of the disk seeks didn't" ?
(just a wild guess ... if it turns out to be true we may want
to look into doing agressive readahead on inode blocks ;))
regards,
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Send all your spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (spam digging piggy)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
