Joerg,

Thanks for the review. I'll post new patch set to address your comment shortly.

Suravee

On 5/28/2013 6:07 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:43:31PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
From: Steven L Kinney <steven.kin...@amd.com>

Add functionality to check the availability of the AMD IOMMU Performance
Counters and export this functionality to other core drivers, such as in this
case, a perf AMD IOMMU PMU.  This feature is not bound to any specific AMD
family/model other than the presence of the IOMMU with PC enabled.

The AMD IOMMU PC support static counting only at this time.

Signed-off-by: Steven Kinney <steven.kin...@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com>
---
V2 Changes:
        - Modify the amd_iommu_pc_get_set_reg_val function
        to support 64 bit values.
        - Fix logic to properly clear amd_iommu_pc_present when
        initialization failed.

  drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c  |  121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_proto.h |    7 +++
  drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_types.h |   12 +++-
  3 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c
index bf51abb..395fa29 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ bool amd_iommu_iotlb_sup __read_mostly = true;
  u32 amd_iommu_max_pasids __read_mostly = ~0;
bool amd_iommu_v2_present __read_mostly;
+bool amd_iommu_pc_present __read_mostly;
bool amd_iommu_force_isolation __read_mostly; @@ -371,21 +372,21 @@ static void iommu_disable(struct amd_iommu *iommu)
   */
  static u8 __iomem * __init iommu_map_mmio_space(u64 address)
  {
-       if (!request_mem_region(address, MMIO_REGION_LENGTH, "amd_iommu")) {
+       if (!request_mem_region(address, MMIO_REG_END_OFFSET, "amd_iommu")) {
This length needs to be different on IOMMUv1 systems where the MMI
region is only 16kb large. Only use MMIO_REG_END_OFFSET on IOMMUv2
systems.

+static void init_iommu_perf_ctr(struct amd_iommu *iommu)
+{
+       u64 val = 0xabcd, val2 = 0;
+
+       if (!iommu_feature(iommu, FEATURE_PC))
+               return;
+
+       amd_iommu_pc_present = true;
+
+       /* Check if the performance counters can be written to */
+       if ((0 != amd_iommu_pc_get_set_reg_val(0, 0, 0, 0, &val, true)) ||
+           (0 != amd_iommu_pc_get_set_reg_val(0, 0, 0, 0, &val2, false)) ||
+           (val != val2)) {
+               pr_err("AMD-Vi: Unable to write to IOMMU perf counter.\n");
+               amd_iommu_pc_present = false;
+               return;
+       }
+
+       pr_info("AMD-Vi: IOMMU performance counters " "supported\n");
Why are this two strings? This makes it hard to grep for the message.


+u8 amd_iommu_pc_get_max_banks(u16 devid)
+{
+       struct amd_iommu *iommu;
+
+       /* locate the iommu governing the devid */
+       iommu = amd_iommu_rlookup_table[devid];
+
+       if (iommu)
+               return iommu->max_banks;
+
+       return -ENODEV;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(amd_iommu_pc_get_max_banks);
You can't return -ENODEV in a function returning u8. Return int instead.

+
+bool amd_iommu_pc_supported(void)
+{
+       return amd_iommu_pc_present;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(amd_iommu_pc_supported);
+
+u8 amd_iommu_pc_get_max_counters(u16 devid)
+{
+       struct amd_iommu *iommu;
+
+       /* locate the iommu governing the devid */
+       iommu = amd_iommu_rlookup_table[devid];
+
+       if (iommu)
+               return iommu->max_counters;
+
+       return -ENODEV;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(amd_iommu_pc_get_max_counters);
Same here. Please don't return negative values as u8.

+
+int amd_iommu_pc_get_set_reg_val(u16 devid, u8 bank, u8 cntr, u8 fxn,
+                                   u64 *value, bool is_write)
+{
+       struct amd_iommu *iommu;
+       u32 offset;
+       u32 max_offset_lim;
+
+       /* Make sure the IOMMU PC resource is available */
+       if (!amd_iommu_pc_present) {
+               pr_info("AMD IOMMU - PC Not supported.\n");
This message is redundant. You already print about about performance
counter availability in the init code. Please remove it.

+               return -ENODEV;
+       }
+
+       /* locate the iommu associated with the device ID */
+       iommu = amd_iommu_rlookup_table[devid];
+       if (iommu == NULL)
+               return -ENODEV;
+
+       /* check for valid iommu pc register indexing */
+       if (fxn < 0 || fxn > 0x28 || (fxn & 7))
+               return -ENODEV;
Does this check for calling errors? If so, you might consider turning
this into a WARN_ON.

+
+       offset = (u32)(((0x40|bank) << 12) | (cntr << 8) | fxn);
+
+       /* limit the offset to the hw defined mmio region aperture */
+       max_offset_lim = (u32)(((0x40|iommu->max_banks) << 12) |
+                               (iommu->max_counters << 8) | 0x28);
+       if ((offset < MMIO_CNTR_REG_OFFSET) ||
+           (offset > max_offset_lim))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       if (is_write) {
+               writel((u32)*value, iommu->mmio_base + offset);
+               writel((*value >> 32), iommu->mmio_base + offset + 4);
+       } else {
+               *value = readl(iommu->mmio_base + offset + 4);
+               *value <<= 32;
+               *value = readl(iommu->mmio_base + offset);
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}

        Joerg





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to