On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 13:18 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> > Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 21:50:04 +1000 > > > It would be handy to be able to just do something like > > > > of_set_property(node, name, ptr, len); > > > > However, that wouldn't help much with the allocation/leak problem, > > though at least it would be easier to use. It could also *try* to re-use > > the current allocation if the new content is of smaller or equal size. > > And this is so much better of an interface because it allows the > OF implementation to decide how to deal with memory allocation > and freeing.
Absolutely, I'm not arguing that point. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
