> That's what's confusing me: why the distinction? It's true that the
> current scheme allows the dev->ioctlfunc() call below to force ENOTTY
> to be returned, bypassing the switch, but presumably that's not what
> one wants.
It allows driver specific code to override generic code, including by reporting
that a given feature is not available/appropriate.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
