3.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josef Ahmad <josef.ah...@linux.intel.com>

commit e6f34cea56f5b95498070eaa9f4aa3ba4a9e4f62 upstream.

i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes a number of bytes to transmit/receive
to/from the bus into the TX FIFO.
For master-rx transactions, the maximum amount of data that can be
received is calculated depending solely on TX and RX FIFO load.

This is racy - TX FIFO may contain master-rx data yet to be
processed, which will eventually land into the RX FIFO. This
data is not taken into account and the function may request more
data than the controller is actually capable of storing.

This patch ensures the driver takes into account the outstanding
master-rx data in TX FIFO to prevent RX FIFO overrun.

Signed-off-by: Josef Ahmad <josef.ah...@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c |   11 ++++++++++-
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
@@ -426,8 +426,14 @@ i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
                                cmd |= BIT(9);
 
                        if (msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].flags & I2C_M_RD) {
+
+                               /* avoid rx buffer overrun */
+                               if (rx_limit - dev->rx_outstanding <= 0)
+                                       break;
+
                                dw_writel(dev, cmd | 0x100, DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
                                rx_limit--;
+                               dev->rx_outstanding++;
                        } else
                                dw_writel(dev, cmd | *buf++, DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
                        tx_limit--; buf_len--;
@@ -480,8 +486,10 @@ i2c_dw_read(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
 
                rx_valid = dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_RXFLR);
 
-               for (; len > 0 && rx_valid > 0; len--, rx_valid--)
+               for (; len > 0 && rx_valid > 0; len--, rx_valid--) {
                        *buf++ = dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
+                       dev->rx_outstanding--;
+               }
 
                if (len > 0) {
                        dev->status |= STATUS_READ_IN_PROGRESS;
@@ -539,6 +547,7 @@ i2c_dw_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, st
        dev->msg_err = 0;
        dev->status = STATUS_IDLE;
        dev->abort_source = 0;
+       dev->rx_outstanding = 0;
 
        ret = i2c_dw_wait_bus_not_busy(dev);
        if (ret < 0)
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
  * @adapter: i2c subsystem adapter node
  * @tx_fifo_depth: depth of the hardware tx fifo
  * @rx_fifo_depth: depth of the hardware rx fifo
+ * @rx_outstanding: current master-rx elements in tx fifo
  */
 struct dw_i2c_dev {
        struct device           *dev;
@@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ struct dw_i2c_dev {
        u32                     master_cfg;
        unsigned int            tx_fifo_depth;
        unsigned int            rx_fifo_depth;
+       int                     rx_outstanding;
 };
 
 #define ACCESS_SWAP            0x00000001


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to