A bisect would be appreciated.  Cc Fenghua.

Dave Jones <da...@redhat.com> wrote:

>On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:03:04PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 05/21/2013 04:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > In 3.10-rc2 I see this happening..
> > > 
> > > [   72.318133] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x306c3, pf=0x2, revision=0x6
> > > [  132.446449] microcode: CPU2 sig=0x306c3, pf=0x2, revision=0x6
> > > [  192.573101] microcode: CPU3 sig=0x306c3, pf=0x2, revision=0x6
>> > [  252.702055] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00
><tig...@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba
> > > 
>> > For some reason the events for udev seem to be getting delayed 60s
>for each core.
> > > 
> > >   Dave
> > > 
> > 
> > Is this a regression from -rc1?
>
>No. Looks like it was introduced between 3.9 and 3.10-rc1
>
>I see bisecting in my future.
>
>       Dave

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to