On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:51:25AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote: > >What's a lot more important is that the mail standards say that this stuff > >should not be interpreted by the receivers as needing wrapping, so > >irregardless of good or bad design it's just plain illegal. > > > >If you want to support wrapping with plain text, investigate > >format=flowed. > > Yes, I did that. > > I'm curious, though: I haven't found the mail standards that forbid > receivers to wrap long lines. Certainly many mail clients do it. > What's the relevant RFC? RFC 2822, 2.1.1. Ralf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to S... Jonathan Lundell
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information ... Richard Gooch
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus informa... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus inf... Richard Gooch
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus inf... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus inf... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus inf... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus informa... Jonathan Lundell
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus informa... Jonathan Lundell
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus inf... Ralf Baechle
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus inf... Jonathan Lundell
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus inf... Steven Willoughby
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus inf... Ralf Baechle
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus inf... Jonathan Lundell
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to SCSI layer Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to SCSI layer Kai Henningsen