On 5/22/2013 2:36 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
Hi, Rohit
Thanks for the patch!
Thanks for the comments... more below
On 05/21/2013 09:32 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
This cleans up the gpio-msm-v2 driver of all the global define usage.
The number of gpios are now defined in the device tree. This enables
adding irqdomain support as well.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani <rvasw...@codeaurora.org>
---
<cut>
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tlmm_lock);
@@ -168,18 +173,20 @@ static void msm_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip,
unsigned offset)
static int msm_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
{
- return MSM_GPIO_TO_INT(chip->base + offset);
+ struct msm_gpio_dev *g_dev = to_msm_gpio_dev(chip);
+ struct irq_domain *domain = g_dev->domain;
+ return irq_create_mapping(domain, offset);
IMO here you should use irq_find_mapping() and create irq mapping once
in .probe. See below comment.
Looking at this more, I would prefer to get rid of the entire for loop
and the irq_create_mapping in probe and
just have the irq_create_mapping in msm_gpio_to_irq. This way we are not
allocating a descriptor for every gpio and only for the ones that call
the msm_gpio_to_irq.
}
<cut>
-static int msm_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
+static struct lock_class_key msm_gpio_lock_class;
+
+static int msm_gpio_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+ irq_set_lockdep_class(irq, &msm_gpio_lock_class);
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &msm_gpio_irq_chip,
+ handle_level_irq);
+ set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops msm_gpio_irq_domain_ops = {
+ .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
+ .map = msm_gpio_irq_domain_map,
+};
+
+static int msm_gpio_irqdomain_init(struct device_node *node, int ngpio)
{
- int i, irq, ret;
+ msm_gpio.domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, ngpio,
+ &msm_gpio_irq_domain_ops, &msm_gpio);
+ if (!msm_gpio.domain) {
+ WARN(1, "Cannot allocate irq_domain\n");
Are you sure that we want to WARN if no memory? I'd return an error and
fail the probe if the driver can't works without interrupts.
Done.
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int msm_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ int i, irq, ret, ngpio;
+ struct resource *res;
+
+ msm_gpio.gpio_chip.label = pdev->name;
+ msm_gpio.gpio_chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
+ of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "ngpio", &ngpio);
+ msm_gpio.gpio_chip.ngpio = ngpio;
+
+ res = platform_get_resource(&pdev->dev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ if (!res) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: no mem resource\n", __func__);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ msm_tlmm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(pdev->dev, res);
+ if (!msm_tlmm_base) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't allocate memory for msm tlmm
base\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ msm_gpio.enabled_irqs = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(unsigned long) * ngpio,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ msm_gpio.wake_irqs = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(unsigned long) * ngpio,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ msm_gpio.dual_edge_irqs = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(unsigned long) * ngpio,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ bitmap_zero(msm_gpio.enabled_irqs, ngpio);
+ bitmap_zero(msm_gpio.wake_irqs, ngpio);
+ bitmap_zero(msm_gpio.dual_edge_irqs, ngpio);
- bitmap_zero(msm_gpio.enabled_irqs, NR_GPIO_IRQS);
- bitmap_zero(msm_gpio.wake_irqs, NR_GPIO_IRQS);
- bitmap_zero(msm_gpio.dual_edge_irqs, NR_GPIO_IRQS);
- msm_gpio.gpio_chip.label = dev->name;
ret = gpiochip_add(&msm_gpio.gpio_chip);
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "gpiochip_add failed with error %d\n", ret);
return ret;
+ }
+
+ summary_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (summary_irq < 0) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No Summary irq defined for msmgpio\n");
+ return summary_irq;
+ }
+
+ msm_gpio_irqdomain_init(pdev->dev.of_node, msm_gpio.gpio_chip.ngpio);
Adding irqdomain might fail, could you check the return value. And if
irqdomain init fail do we need to set up chained handler for summary_irq
at all?
Done.
for (i = 0; i < msm_gpio.gpio_chip.ngpio; ++i) {
irq = msm_gpio_to_irq(&msm_gpio.gpio_chip, i);
I'd call irq_create_mapping() instead. This way the mapping will be
created once in .probe and use irq_find_mapping() in gpio_to_irq.
Will get rid of this for loop as mentioned above. Thanks for catching this.
+ irq_set_lockdep_class(irq, &msm_gpio_lock_class);
irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &msm_gpio_irq_chip,
handle_level_irq);
set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
These three function calls are not needed anymore because
irq_create_mapping() will call internally irqdomain .map operation. The
.map already calls these three functions.
Done.
}
- irq_set_chained_handler(TLMM_SCSS_SUMMARY_IRQ,
- msm_summary_irq_handler);
+ irq_set_chained_handler(summary_irq, msm_summary_irq_handler);
+
return 0;
}
- Stan
Thanks,
Rohit Vaswani
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
