On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:55:01PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 05/22/2013 08:49 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: > >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:44:20PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > >>On 05/22/2013 07:48 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: > >>>On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > >>>>Hmm, maybe a little bit too early. While restoring the MAC address now > >>>>works, another bug arises which I guess is related with phy setup > >>>>and aneg. > >>>> > >>>>Will investigate and update patch set accordingly. > >>> > >>>Cool, chances are, we should be able to take that patch in by itself for > >>>this merge window... > >> > >>Which patch do you mean? The local-mac-address workaround will only be > >>available for DT mv643xx_eth because it uses the DT node to store the > >>MAC. > > > >I thought you were replacing the unconditional ethernet clock grabbing > >with reading the mac from the registers and updating the dtb? In > >mach-kirkwood/board-dt.c? > > True. But there is no node for ethernet controllers in kirkwood.dtsi > yet. It will be there with mv643xx_eth DT patches applied and that is > when the corresponding replacement patch should also be taken in. > > I was just confused about your referral to the merge window, because I > guess it is up to David Miller to decide when/whether to take > mv643xx_eth patches in.
Ahh, no, that was me. I was contemplating adding the dt entries in this merge window at one point and must've got my wires crossed. Sorry for the confusion. thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
