On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 02:17:17PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 3 May 2013 17:35:44 -0500 Russ Anderson <r...@sgi.com> wrote:
> 
> > The routine disable_nonboot_cpus() shuts down cpus sequentially
> > using for_each_online_cpu(cpu) to call cpu_down() one cpu at
> > a time.  cpu_down() calls __stop_machine() which stops all
> > the cpus while it disables one.  Then it re-enables the remaining
> > cpus, only to do it all over again for the next cpu.  The 
> > result is that it takes 16 minutes on a 1024 cpu system to 
> > disable 1023 cpus.
> > 
> > This patch changes disable_nonboot_cpus() to pass a bitmask
> > of cpus to cpu_down() and modifies cpu_down() to only call
> > __stop_machine() once.
> > 
> > On a 1024 cpu system this reduces the time it takes to disable
> > all but one cpu from 16 minutes down to 4 minutes.
> 
> That's still a helluva long time.  What's the kernel *doing* for
> all that time?

Since __raw_notifier_call_chain() isn't thread safe, it is still
called one cpu at a time.  See "__cpu_notify(CPU_DOWN_PREPARE" below.
So we still go sequentially for each cpu through the call chain.

These are the two heaviest hitters on the call chain.

    sched_init_smp ->
        cpuset_cpu_inactive ->
            cpuset_update_active_cpus ->
                    partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL)
                    schedule_work(&cpuset_hotplug_work);
                        cpuset_hotplug_workfn
                            mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
                            partition_sched_domains()

                    partition_sched_domains ->
                            unregister_sched_domain_sysctl() ->
                                    unregister_sysctl_table
                            register_sched_domain_sysctl
                                    for_each_possible_cpu()
                                    register_sysctl_table


    uncore_cpu_nb -> uncore_cpu_notifier
           uncore_event_exit_cpu
                   for_each_online_cpu()

The partition_sched_domains() code gets called for each cpu,
each time destroying and building new domains.
register_sched_domain_sysctl() calls for_each_possible_cpu()
each time.

Likewise uncore_event_exit_cpu() calls for_each_online_cpu()
for each cpu.

Neither of those scale well.


> > --- linux.orig/kernel/cpu.c 2013-05-03 09:56:31.145508321 -0500
> > +++ linux/kernel/cpu.c      2013-05-03 17:01:20.652959400 -0500
> >
> > ...
> >
> > @@ -255,21 +255,21 @@ static int __ref take_cpu_down(void *_pa
> >     if (err < 0)
> >             return err;
> >  
> > -   cpu_notify(CPU_DYING | param->mod, param->hcpu);
> > +   cpu_notify(CPU_DYING | param->mod, hcpu);
> >     /* Park the stopper thread */
> >     kthread_park(current);
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /* Requires cpu_add_remove_lock to be held */
> > -static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
> > +static int __ref _cpu_down(const cpumask_t *cpus_to_offline, int 
> > tasks_frozen)
> 
> _cpu_down() is now misnamed - it downs multiple CPUs.

OK, I'll change it.

> >  {
> > -   int err, nr_calls = 0;
> > +   int err = 0, cpu = 0, nr_calls = 0;
> >     void *hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
> > +   cpumask_var_t cpus_offlined;
> >     unsigned long mod = tasks_frozen ? CPU_TASKS_FROZEN : 0;
> >     struct take_cpu_down_param tcd_param = {
> >             .mod = mod,
> > -           .hcpu = hcpu,
> >     };
> >  
> >     if (num_online_cpus() == 1)
> > @@ -278,46 +278,67 @@ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int
> >     if (!cpu_online(cpu))
> >             return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > +   if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_offlined, GFP_KERNEL))
> > +           return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> >     cpu_hotplug_begin();
> > +   cpumask_copy(cpus_offlined, cpus_to_offline);
> >  
> > -   err = __cpu_notify(CPU_DOWN_PREPARE | mod, hcpu, -1, &nr_calls);
> > -   if (err) {
> > -           nr_calls--;
> > -           __cpu_notify(CPU_DOWN_FAILED | mod, hcpu, nr_calls, NULL);
> > -           printk("%s: attempt to take down CPU %u failed\n",
> > +   for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, *cpus_to_offline) {
> > +           if (!cpu_online(cpu))
> > +                   continue;
> > +           hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
> > +           err = __cpu_notify(CPU_DOWN_PREPARE | mod, hcpu, -1, &nr_calls);
> > +           if (err) {
> > +                   nr_calls--;
> > +                   __cpu_notify(CPU_DOWN_FAILED | mod, hcpu, nr_calls, 
> > NULL);
> > +                   pr_err("%s: attempt to take down CPU %u failed\n",
> >                             __func__, cpu);
> > -           goto out_release;
> > +                   goto out_release;
> > +           }
> > +           smpboot_park_threads(cpu);
> >     }
> > -   smpboot_park_threads(cpu);
> >  
> > -   err = __stop_machine(take_cpu_down, &tcd_param, cpumask_of(cpu));
> > +   err = __stop_machine(take_cpu_down, &tcd_param, cpus_to_offline);
> >     if (err) {
> >             /* CPU didn't die: tell everyone.  Can't complain. */
> 
> This comment is now inaccurate.  "One or more of the CPUs didn't die"?.
> 
> I'm not sure what "Can't complain" means.  Perhaps expand on this while
> you're there?

OK.

> > -           smpboot_unpark_threads(cpu);
> > -           cpu_notify_nofail(CPU_DOWN_FAILED | mod, hcpu);
> > +           for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, *cpus_to_offline) {
> > +                   hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
> > +                   smpboot_unpark_threads(cpu);
> > +                   cpu_notify_nofail(CPU_DOWN_FAILED | mod, hcpu);
> 
> Is this accurate?  What happens if we asked stop_machine() to down 100
> CPUs but it failed at CPU #50?  We now tell listeners that we failed to
> down all 100 CPUs?  That's not true.

I'll look closer at that.

> > +           }
> >             goto out_release;
> >     }
> > -   BUG_ON(cpu_online(cpu));
> >  
> >     /*
> >      * The migration_call() CPU_DYING callback will have removed all
> >      * runnable tasks from the cpu, there's only the idle task left now
> >      * that the migration thread is done doing the stop_machine thing.
> > -    *
> > -    * Wait for the stop thread to go away.
> >      */
> > -   while (!idle_cpu(cpu))
> > -           cpu_relax();
> > -
> > -   /* This actually kills the CPU. */
> > -   __cpu_die(cpu);
> > +   for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, *cpus_offlined) {
> > +           BUG_ON(cpu_online(cpu));
> >  
> > -   /* CPU is completely dead: tell everyone.  Too late to complain. */
> > -   cpu_notify_nofail(CPU_DEAD | mod, hcpu);
> > -
> > -   check_for_tasks(cpu);
> > +           /*
> > +            * Wait for the stop thread to go away.
> > +            */
> > +           while (!idle_cpu(cpu))
> > +                   cpu_relax();
> > +
> > +           /*
> > +            * This actually kills the CPU.
> > +            */
> > +           __cpu_die(cpu);
> > +
> > +           /*
> > +            * CPU is completely dead: tell everyone.  Too late to complain.
> > +            */
> > +           hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
> > +           cpu_notify_nofail(CPU_DEAD | mod, hcpu);
> > +           check_for_tasks(cpu);
> > +   }
> >  
> >  out_release:
> > +   free_cpumask_var(cpus_offlined);
> >     cpu_hotplug_done();
> 
> Swap the above two lines and we reduced the locked region by an
> unmeasurable amount!
> 
> >     if (!err)
> >             cpu_notify_nofail(CPU_POST_DEAD | mod, hcpu);
> >
> > ...
> >

-- 
Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead  
SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc          r...@sgi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to