On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 04:22:21PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Axel,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Sunday 19 May 2013 13:45:31 Axel Lin wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel....@ingics.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
> > index 8e6d8d7..351addd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
> > @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int tpu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > 
> >     pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> > 
> > -   return 0;
> > +   return pwmchip_remove(&tpu->chip);
> 
> Could you please move that line at the beginning of the function ? There 
> would 
> be a race condition otherwise, as the user could reenable PWM between the 
> tpu_pwm_timer_stop() calls and the pwmchip_remove() call.
> 
> Apart from that, the patch looks good.

Also, could you please CC linux...@vger.kernel.org,
that will help me track the change through patchwork.

Thanks!

> 
> >  }
> > 
> >  static struct platform_driver tpu_driver = {
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to