On 16/05/2013, at 12:07 AM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > You are missing a binding in Documentation/devicetree, same as for some of > the other drivers in this series.
Should we be adding a vendor prefix to it too? If so, we're not sure whether to use "ti," or not since this isn't an official port by TI. > It seems strange to assign the clk_name variable to node->name > first and then overriding it with the clock-output-names property. > Is that intentional? If so, please explain it in a comment. > I copied that bit of boilerplate from drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c but I'm guessing it's to use the node name as the clock name unless there is a property called "clock-output-names" Cheers, Daniel Tang-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
