>>> On 14.05.13 at 17:59, John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 05/14/2013 12:57 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 14.05.13 at 02:52, John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Honestly, it seems a little strange to me. If you're running as dom0, >>> why does HYPERVISOR_dom0_op() not cause the hypervisor to set the cmos >>> its virtualizing? This seems to mess with the proper virtualization >>> layering. >> Thy hypervisor tries to control as little system and peripheral devices >> as possible, and the CMOS (including the clock) is among those not >> controlled by it, but by Dom0. > > Huh. So what does calling HYPERVISOR_dom0_op do then?
Here it merely tells the hypervisor that the wall clock changed (so it can propagate this on to DomU-s). Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/