In addition to the two changes I proposed to Andrea's new patch, I
also realized we might want to do a fdatasync() when locking files. If
we don't, then locking won't be atomic on mmap()...

Here therefore is Andrea's patch with the changes I propose. Opinions?

Cheers,
  Trond

diff -u --recursive --new-file linux-2.4.4-fixes/fs/nfs/file.c 
linux-2.4.4-mmap/fs/nfs/file.c
--- linux-2.4.4/fs/nfs/file.c   Fri Feb  9 20:29:44 2001
+++ linux-2.4.4-mmap/fs/nfs/file.c      Wed May  9 09:18:45 2001
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 static ssize_t nfs_file_write(struct file *, const char *, size_t, loff_t *);
 static int  nfs_file_flush(struct file *);
 static int  nfs_fsync(struct file *, struct dentry *dentry, int datasync);
+static void nfs_file_close_vma(struct vm_area_struct *);
 
 struct file_operations nfs_file_operations = {
        read:           nfs_file_read,
@@ -57,6 +58,11 @@
        setattr:        nfs_notify_change,
 };
 
+static struct vm_operations_struct nfs_file_vm_ops = {
+       nopage:         filemap_nopage,
+       close:          nfs_file_close_vma,
+};
+
 /* Hack for future NFS swap support */
 #ifndef IS_SWAPFILE
 # define IS_SWAPFILE(inode)    (0)
@@ -104,6 +110,20 @@
        return result;
 }
 
+static void nfs_file_close_vma(struct vm_area_struct * vma)
+{
+       struct inode * inode;
+
+       inode = vma->vm_file->f_dentry->d_inode;
+
+       if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_PAGES) {
+               down(&inode->i_sem);
+               filemap_fdatasync(inode->i_mapping);
+               nfs_wb_all(inode);
+               up(&inode->i_sem);
+       }
+}
+
 static int
 nfs_file_mmap(struct file * file, struct vm_area_struct * vma)
 {
@@ -115,8 +135,11 @@
                dentry->d_parent->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.name);
 
        status = nfs_revalidate_inode(NFS_SERVER(inode), inode);
-       if (!status)
+       if (!status) {
                status = generic_file_mmap(file, vma);
+               if (!status)
+                       vma->vm_ops = &nfs_file_vm_ops;
+       }
        return status;
 }
 
@@ -283,9 +306,10 @@
         * Flush all pending writes before doing anything
         * with locks..
         */
-       down(&filp->f_dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
+       down(&inode->i_sem);
+       filemap_fdatasync(inode->i_mapping);
        status = nfs_wb_all(inode);
-       up(&filp->f_dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
+       up(&inode->i_sem);
        if (status < 0)
                return status;
 
@@ -300,10 +324,11 @@
         */
  out_ok:
        if ((cmd == F_SETLK || cmd == F_SETLKW) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
-               down(&filp->f_dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
+               down(&inode->i_sem);
+               filemap_fdatasync(inode->i_mapping);
                nfs_wb_all(inode);      /* we may have slept */
                nfs_zap_caches(inode);
-               up(&filp->f_dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
+               up(&inode->i_sem);
        }
        return status;
 }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to