On Sunday, May 12, 2013 08:46:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > > From: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de> > > > > I don't see how the virtual address of the tuners pointer would be of > > any help to anyone so remove it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de> > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c > > b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c > > index b0ffef96bf77..4b9bb5def6f1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c > > @@ -547,7 +547,6 @@ static int od_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data) > > tuners->io_is_busy = should_io_be_busy(); > > > > dbs_data->tuners = tuners; > > - pr_info("%s: tuners %p\n", __func__, tuners); > > mutex_init(&dbs_data->mutex); > > return 0; > > } > > Sorry for this message :( > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
Applied to the linux-next branch. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/