> +#if NR_CPUS > 1 > + cpus /= cpumask_weight(cpu_core_mask(0)) / cpu_data(0).booted_cores; > +#endif
Not entirely sure what you are trying to do here (apart from making "cpus" be a smaller number). What is the reasoning behind the right hand side of this expression? Is this problem more related to how EDAC is injecting an error? When I've used other methods (e.g. ACPI/EINJ) I end up with a machine check that is broadcast to all processors ... so "cpus = num_online_cpus()" is the correct[1] number of processors to wait for. -Tony [1] Andi may point me (again) to a fix to help deal with the case that Linux has taken some cpus offline. In that case this code is wrong as the "offline" cpus will still show up for machine checks. But there are troubling corner cases with the fix. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
