On Mon, 7 May 2001, Brian Gerst wrote: > > This patch will still cause the user process to seg fault: The error > code on the stack will not match the address in %cr2. You've convinced me. Good thinking. Let's do the irq thing. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe Brian Gerst
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt s... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interru... Brian Gerst
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interru... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not int... Brian Gerst
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handle... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault ha... David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault ha... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault ha... Brian Gerst
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page faul... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page faul... Nigel Gamble
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page faul... Brian Gerst
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page faul... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page faul... Brian Gerst
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page faul... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page faul... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page faul... Brian Gerst
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page faul... Nigel Gamble
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault ha... Jesper Juhl
- Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault ha... Alan Cox