On 05/08/2013 10:06 AM, Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:20:31AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> It's better to define audit_ever_enabled as bool
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  kernel/audit.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
>> index 4595a9e..1138ff5 100644
>> --- a/kernel/audit.c
>> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
>> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static int audit_initialized;
>>  #define AUDIT_OFF   0
>>  #define AUDIT_ON    1
>>  #define AUDIT_LOCKED        2
>> -int         audit_ever_enabled;
>> +bool                audit_ever_enabled;
> 
> I think you're better off placing this at the beginning of the series
> and submitting it separately since it's only incidentally related to
> this RFC.
> 

Thanks for your suggestion. will send these cleanup patches separately.

Thanks
Gao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to