On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 02:02:49PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > You are quite right, I am getting ahead of myself. Please see below
> > > for the patch.
> >
> > Doesn't fix it for me.
> >
> > Is it this one instead perhaps ?
> >
> > 89 #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE
> > 90 if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask) {
> > 91 alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask);
> > 92 have_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> > 93 }
>
> Hmmm... That was in fact the one that the patch was intended to change.
> Just out of curiosity, where did the patch apply instead?
I think this might be my screwup. I did it by hand, and misapplied it
to the top of rcu_nocb_setup() instead.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
