On Thursday, May 02, 2013 05:10:26 PM Tejun Heo wrote: > Hey, Rafael. > > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 11:06:35PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > v2 moves the skip check to freeze_task(), and expands the commit > > > messages. > > > > The entire series makes sense to me, so are there any objections? > > > > Tejun, Oleg?? > > Generally looks good to me. I'm a bit uncomfortable with the > generic-looking expansion of the freezable API as it can't be > something which can be used in any generic manner. It'd be great if > we just add only the used ones (do we already?)
I'm not sure about that, unfortunately. > and add some sort of lockdep annotation so that people don't use them while > holding any locks. I guess we can add that anyway? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
