On 05/01/2013 09:39 AM, Simon Jeons wrote:
> Ping, ;-)
> On 04/18/2013 08:13 AM, Simon Jeons wrote:
>> Hi Jerome,
>> On 04/17/2013 08:11 PM, Jerome Marchand wrote:
>>> Since commit 62c230b, swap_writepage() calls direct_IO on swap files.
>>> However, in that case page isn't redirtied if I/O fails, and is
>>> therefore
>>> handled afterwards as if it has been successfully written to the swap
>>> file, leading to memory corruption when the page is eventually swapped
>>> back in.
>>> This patch sets the page dirty when direct_IO() fails. It fixes a memory
>>
>> If swapfile has related page cache which cached swapfile in memory? It
>> is not necessary, correct?
I'm not sure I understand the question. What I can tell you is that it is
necessary if the swapfile is located on a fs that uses swap_activate (only
NFS so far). Other swap file hasn't been impacted by commit 62c230b.
>>
>>> corruption that happened while using swap-over-NFS.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarc...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> mm/page_io.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/page_io.c b/mm/page_io.c
>>> index 78eee32..04ca00d 100644
>>> --- a/mm/page_io.c
>>> +++ b/mm/page_io.c
>>> @@ -222,6 +222,8 @@ int swap_writepage(struct page *page, struct
>>> writeback_control *wbc)
>>> if (ret == PAGE_SIZE) {
>>> count_vm_event(PSWPOUT);
>>> ret = 0;
>>> + } else {
>>> + set_page_dirty(page);
>>> }
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>>> the body to majord...@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
>>> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>>> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"d...@kvack.org";> em...@kvack.org </a>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
