On Thursday 02 May 2013, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > > What do you think of my patch as compared to yours?
> >
> > I think in the end it comes down to the question where you want to
> > head with your driver. The way I did my version was going towards
> > making it similar to EHCI, with stand-alone bus glue drivers
> > and a core that is just a library module but does not register
> > a device_driver by itself.
> >
> > Given that there are just three bus glues from UHCI, and at most
> > two of them enabled at the same time, I don't see a direct need
> > for UHCI to go down the same route as EHCI. If you want to just
> > leave this driver alone, your patch is simpler and has the same
> > effect in the end. Otherwise I think my patch avoids changing it
> > all again once the driver gets reworked.
>
> Okay then, I'll submit my patch to Greg after the merge window closes.
Ok, thanks!
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
