On Thu, 2 May 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:20:32PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Thu, 2 May 2013, Will Deacon wrote: > > > Hi Stefano, > > > > > > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:12:12PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > ping > > > > > > Is this a ping to have this pulled into Russell's tree? > > > > I thought that we agreed that the patches should go via the arm-soc > > tree, after Russell acks them. > > Okay, well, is there a reason for them to go through arm-soc? They > look more like core code to me than SoC specific - they only minimally > touch mach-virt.
The original reason is that some SoC specific code depends on this series (Calxeda I believe). But you are probably right, if you prefer that I issue a pull request for your tree, I have no problems with that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
