On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:02 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > +   while (!list_empty(&bridge->transactions)) {
> > +           trans = list_first_entry(&bridge->transactions,
> > +                           struct vexpress_config_trans, list);
> >  
> > -           bridge->info->func_exec(trans->func->func, trans->offset,
> > -                           trans->write, trans->data);
> > +           vexpress_config_dump_trans("Executing pending", trans);
> > +           status = bridge->info->func_exec(trans->func->func,
> > +                           trans->offset, trans->write, trans->data);
> > +
> > +           if (status == VEXPRESS_CONFIG_STATUS_DONE)
> > +                   vexpress_config_dump_trans("Finished pending", trans);
> > +           else
> > +                   break;
> 
> For each transaction we execute in this loop, don't we also need to do
> the actions vexpress_config_complete does? E.g.
> 
>       trans->status = status;
>       list_del(&trans->list);
>       complete(&trans->completion);
> 
> except in the case status==VEXPRESS_CONFIG_STATUS_WAIT.

You're completely right. I shouldn't have write this code as the last
thing in the afternoon...

Will send v2.

Paweł


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to