* Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:57:04 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > PF_THREAD_BOUND was removed/replaced in linux-next's a9ab775bc > > > ("workqueue: directly restore CPU affinity of workers from CPU_ONLINE") > > > > I don't see PF_THREAD_BOUND being removed by commit a9ab775bc. Did you > > mean some other commit? > > commit 14a40ffccd6163bbcd1d6f32b28a88ffe6149fc6 > Author: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> > Date: Tue Mar 19 13:45:20 2013 -0700 > > sched: replace PF_THREAD_BOUND with PF_NO_SETAFFINITY
I don't think much action is needed: whenever someone integrates the workqueue tree with these reboot changes, or the workqueue changes hit upstream, a s/PF_THREAD_BOUND/PF_NO_SETAFFINITY should do the trick, right? Btw., if that's true then the workqueue tree should probably grow this helper: #define PF_THREAD_BOUND PF_NO_SETAFFINITY migration/backport helper, which can be removed in v3.11 or so. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/