* Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:57:04 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > > PF_THREAD_BOUND was removed/replaced in linux-next's a9ab775bc
> > > ("workqueue: directly restore CPU affinity of workers from CPU_ONLINE")
> > 
> > I don't see PF_THREAD_BOUND being removed by commit a9ab775bc. Did you 
> > mean some other commit?
> 
> commit 14a40ffccd6163bbcd1d6f32b28a88ffe6149fc6
> Author: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
> Date:   Tue Mar 19 13:45:20 2013 -0700
> 
>     sched: replace PF_THREAD_BOUND with PF_NO_SETAFFINITY

I don't think much action is needed: whenever someone integrates the 
workqueue tree with these reboot changes, or the workqueue changes hit 
upstream, a s/PF_THREAD_BOUND/PF_NO_SETAFFINITY should do the trick, 
right?

Btw., if that's true then the workqueue tree should probably grow this 
helper:

        #define PF_THREAD_BOUND PF_NO_SETAFFINITY

migration/backport helper, which can be removed in v3.11 or so.

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to