Andrew, here is the patch I promised :)

Everywhere else in the code, we check sma->sem_perm.deleted under
the semaphore array lock, so we should do teh same here.
The easy fix is to simply not drop and re-take the lock, but keep
it locked.

This patch can be folded into ipcsem-fine-grained-locking-for-semtimedop.patch

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com>
---
 ipc/sem.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 5711616..efdaee6 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1243,10 +1243,9 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int 
semid, int semnum,
                                err = -EIDRM;
                                goto out_free;
                        }
-                       sem_unlock(sma, -1);
-               }
+               } else
+                       sem_lock(sma, NULL, -1);
 
-               sem_lock(sma, NULL, -1);
                for (i = 0; i < sma->sem_nsems; i++)
                        sem_io[i] = sma->sem_base[i].semval;
                sem_unlock(sma, -1);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to