2013/4/19 Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>:
>>         if (!task_cputime_zero(&tsk->cputime_expires)) {
>>                 struct task_cputime task_sample = {
>> -                       .utime = utime,
>> -                       .stime = stime,
>>                         .sum_exec_runtime = tsk->se.sum_exec_runtime
>>                 };
>> +               task_cputime(tsk, &task_sample.utime, &task_sample.stime);
>
> That too needs to be in another patch. It's a bug that concerns full
> dynticks cputime accounting :)

Oops, misread, it's just moving the function, I thought it was
missing. Nevermind.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to