On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:28:36PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:51 AM > > To: KY Srinivasan; Michael S. Tsirkin > > Cc: o...@aepfle.de; b...@alien8.de; a...@canonical.com; x...@kernel.org; > > t...@linutronix.de; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; > > gre...@linuxfoundation.org; > > jasow...@redhat.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; h...@zytor.com > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] X86: Add a check to catch Xen emulation of Hyper-V > > > > >>> On 17.04.13 at 17:31, KY Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > If Xen were to change where it would not unconditionally emulate Hyper-V, > > > I > > > would not be opposed to taking > > > this check out. > > > > But it doesn't do this unconditionally, only upon admin request. > > >From the discussion we had a couple of months ago, the default setting was > >to enable > Hyper-V emulation for all guests. If this is not the case, we ought to be > able to drop this. > However, I think it is not reasonable to add additional checks (in addition > to hypervisor check) > to customize the run-time in the guest for the specific Hypervisor. > > Regards, > > K. Y
Parse error. What are you trying to say? I'm just saying it's best to do things in the way that make it possible for Xen to implement hyperv in a more complete way in the future and have things just work and in a way that does not change guest/hypervisor interface. > > > > Jan > > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
