On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:40 PM, H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote: > On 04/15/2013 07:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> >> I also am starting to think that this really would be done better being >> integrated with the decompressor code, since that code already ends up >> moving the code around... no reason to do this again. >> > > Another good reason to do this in the decompressor wrapper: it can be > written in C that way.
This would make the code much more readable, for sure. And given that the 64-bit relocation work happens after decompression, this seems only right. Good idea! I'll start working on it. -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
