On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 08:10:05AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > I think rebooting on the same CPU where we booted up is something worth
> > having in
> > general, as a firmware robustness feature. (assuming the CPU in question is
> > still
> > online)
>
> Yeah, we've had issues with ACPI in the past, so I do think we should
> always reboot using the BP. Even if it almost certainly works on 99+%
> of all machines on any random CPU.
>
> The optimal solution would be to just speed up the
> disable_nonboot_cpus() code so much that it isn't an issue. That would
> be good for suspending too, although I guess suspend isn't a big issue
> if you have a thousand CPU's.
>
> Has anybody checked whether we could do the cpu_down() on non-boot
> CPU's in parallel? Right now we serialize the thing completely, with
> one single
>
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> ...
>
> loop that does a synchrinous _cpu_down() for each CPU. No wonder it
> takes forever. We do __stop_machine() over and over and over again:
> the whole thing is basically O(n**2) in CPU's.
Yes, I have a test patch that replaces for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
with a cpu bitmask in disable_nonboot_cpus(). The lower level
routines already take a bitmask. It allows __stop_machine() to
be called just once. That change reduces shutdown time on a
1024 cpu machine from 16 minutes 4 minutes. Significant improvement,
but not good enough.
The next significant bottleneck is __cpu_notify(). Tried creating
worker threads to parallelize the shutdown, but the problem is
__cpu_notify() is not thread safe. Putting a lock around it
caused all the worker threads to fight over the lock.
Note that __cpu_notify() has to be called for all cpus being
shut down because the cpu_chain notifier call chain has cpu as a
parameter. The delema is that cpu_chain notifiers need to be called on
all cpus, but cannot be done in parallel due to __cpu_notify() not being
thread safe. Spinning through the notifier chain sequentially for all
cpus just takes a long time.
The real fix would be to make the &cpu_chain notifier per cpu, or at
least thread safe, so that all the cpus being shut down could do so
in parallel. That is a significant change with ramifications on
other code.
I will post a patch shortly with the cpu bitmask change. Changing
__cpu_notify() will take more discussion.
> Linus
--
Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead
SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc r...@sgi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
