3.5.7.10 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <[email protected]>

commit 2e1253d640eb7f8707d2591c93097c1e9f9c71d5 upstream.

When calculating "offset" for final RSSI calibration we're using numbers
bigger than s8 can hold. We have for example:
offset[j] = 232 - poll_results[j];
formula. If poll_results[j] is small enough (it usually is) we treat
number's bit as a sign bit. For example 232 - 1 becomes:
0xE8 - 0x1 = 0xE7, which is not 231 but -25.

This code was introduced in e0c9a0219a8f542e3946fe972a68aacf8c3f906c
and caused stability regression on some cards, for ex. BCM4322.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
index 5ae0b6a..6be2f73 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c
@@ -1320,7 +1320,7 @@ static void b43_nphy_rev3_rssi_cal(struct b43_wldev *dev)
        u16 clip_off[2] = { 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF };
 
        u8 vcm_final = 0;
-       s8 offset[4];
+       s32 offset[4];
        s32 results[8][4] = { };
        s32 results_min[4] = { };
        s32 poll_results[4] = { };
@@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ static void b43_nphy_rev2_rssi_cal(struct b43_wldev *dev, 
u8 type)
        u8 regs_save_radio[2];
        u16 regs_save_phy[2];
 
-       s8 offset[4];
+       s32 offset[4];
        u8 core;
        u8 rail;
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to