On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 01:05:59PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > On 2013年04月06日 07:48, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 04:05:25PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> need break when 'target_thread' get value, firstly. > >>> >> > >>> >> 'tmp' is a stack (thread->transaction_stack), > >>> >> if 'proc' was the same between child node and parent node, > >>> >> the child would have higher priority than parent. > >> > > >> > Are you sure about this? > >> > > >> > have you tested it? > >> > > > Theoretically this should not change the behavior. The purpose of this > > code it to make sure only thread per process is part of a transaction > > stack, so if it finds more than one transaction with a matching > > process, they should all point to the same thread object. I think a > > better change description is needed though. > > > ok, thanks. > I will send patch v2 (also mark you as Signed-off).
You can NEVER add someone else's "Signed-off-by", unless they actually do it (hint, that did not happen here at all.) Please go read Documentation/SubmittingPatches again to learn exactly what Signed-off-by: really is (a legal agreement), it is not something to throw around lightly like this. > (if the patch v2 still need improvement, please reply in time). In time for what? Please test these patches before you resend them. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
