On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote: > I have to admit to being somewhat skeptical toward KASLR with only 8 > bits of randomness. There are at least two potential ways of > dramatically increasing the available randomness: > > 1. actually compose the kernel of multiple independently relocatable > pieces (maybe chunk it on 2M boundaries or something.) > > 2. compile the kernel as one of the memory models which can be executed > anywhere in the 64-bit address space. The cost of this would have > to be quantified, of course.
Why just let bootloader to load kernel on random address instead? For our 64bit bzImage, boot loader could load kernel to anywhere above 4G. Thanks Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
