On 5 April 2013 09:51, Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com> wrote: > Currently get_regulator returns -EPROBE_DEFER in the case of regulator supply > which have no device tree node or even if regulator which are depicted in > device > tree node is defering it's registration for valid reasons. > > This makes it impossible to use an regulator that registers itself after > cpufreq-cpu0 probe is complete. The reason for the same is regulator framework > fails to return appropriate error value when device tree binding is not > actually > present as a node. > > Once we fix that, we can then fix cpufreq-cpu0 to make intelligent decisions > based on return value. > > Nishanth Menon (2): > regulator: core: return err value for regulator_get if there is no DT > binding > cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: defer probe when regulator is not ready > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ > drivers/regulator/core.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
