On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:05:36AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > When we fail to allocate the node pwq, we can use the default pwq > for the node. > > Thus we can avoid failure after allocated default pwq, and remove > some code for failure path.
I don't know about this one. The reason why we fall back to the default one during CPU UP/DONW is because we don't want to interfere with CPU hotplug which doesn't really have much to do with specific workqueues and shouldn't fail even when things go pretty hairy - e.g. if the user turned off the screen of his/her phone or a laptop is thrown into the backpack with lid closed, CPU_DOWNs during suspend better not fail from memory allocation. apply_workqueue_attrs() is different. We *want* to notify the issuer that something went wrong affnd the action requested couldn't be fulfilled in full. We don't want to hide a failure. It'll show up as a silent performance degradation that nobody knows why it's happening. So, nope, doesn't look like a good idea to me. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/