On 04/03/2013 03:16 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisb...@canonical.com <mailto:joseph.salisb...@canonical.com>> wrote:

    Hi Daniel,

    A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0].  After a kernel
    bisect, it was found the following was the first bad commit:


    commit c2fb7916927e989ea424e61ce5fe617e54878827
    Merge: 29de6ce 6f0c058
    Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
    <mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>>
    Date:   Mon Oct 22 14:34:51 2012 +0200

        Merge tag 'v3.7-rc2' into drm-intel-next-queued



    The regression was introduced as of v3.8-rc1.  However, further
    testing also shows this bug is now fixed in v3.9-rc4.

    I see that you are the author of this patch, so I wanted see if I
    can get your feedback.  Do you happen to have an idea what may
    have fixed this in v3.9-rc4, so we can send a request to stable,
    if not already done?  Otherwise, I can perform a reverse bisect to
    see which commit fixed this.


So apparently it's an oops somewhere in the nouveau setup code, which bisected to a backmerge which has _only_ conflicts in drm/i915 driver code.

I have no idea what blew up here, sorry.
-Daniel

Thanks for the info, Daniel.  I'll go the reverse bisect route.





    Thanks,

    Joe

    [0] http://pad.lv/1109309




--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to