On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> Why can't we just use the device suspend/resume functions rather than > global (syscore) suspend/resume functions? Presumably this is to ensure > that all other drivers suspend first, then the pinctrl driver does, and > the reverse for resume. Can't we rely on deferred probe to ensure that > instead? > > To make that work, we might need every affected driver to define a dummy > pinmux state in DT that references the pinctrl driver, to make sure they > all get probed after the pinctrl driver. Hm that reminds me of that policy change I suggested a while back to do this instead of using hogs where possible. It has the nice side-effect that when we inspect the debugfs info all pins will be properly owned by respective consuming device. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
