On 04/02/2013 04:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Do you have any numbers indicating that this actually makes things better?
> 
> Rafael

No, I don't.
The expected behaviour after this patch is to "force" max frequency few 
sampling periods earlier.
The idea was to increase system responsiveness especially on 'small' embedded 
systems (phones for example).

Actually, I thought to provide some numbers but I had no idea how to measure 
this.

Would it be enough to provide the number of times that the CPU increases 
frequency 
because of early_demand versus the total number of increments? 


Thanks,
Stratos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to