On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:47 PM, H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote: > On 04/01/2013 12:26 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > >> crashkernel=<size>,<option>,<option>.. and crashkernel=800M,high sound >> good to me. >> >> So atleast for 3.9 kernel, shall we hide new semantics behind >> crashkernel=XM,high and by default crashkernel=XM tries to emulate >> crashkernel=XM,low to retain backward compatibility? > > Yes, I suspect so.
current we have: 1. crashkernel=XM 2. crashkernel=XM crashkernel_low=YM so you want to change to 1. crashkernel=XM,low or crashkernel=XM 2. crashkernel=XM,high 3. crashkernel=XM,high crashkernel=YM,low looks like you change your mind, now you are agreeing on some could low and some could be high. Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
