From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>

The ACPI handle of struct i2c_adapter's dev member should not be
set, because this causes that struct i2c_adapter to be associated
with the ACPI device node corresponding to its parent as the
second "physical_device", which is incorrect (this happens during
the registration of struct i2c_adapter).  Consequently,
acpi_i2c_register_devices() should use the ACPI handle of the
parent of the struct i2c_adapter it is called for rather than the
struct i2c_adapter's ACPI handle (which should be NULL).

Make that happen and modify the i2c-designware-platdrv driver,
which currently is the only driver for ACPI-enumerated I2C
controller chips, not to set the ACPI handle for the
struct i2c_adapter it creates.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_i2c.c                     |    2 +-
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c |    1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_i2c.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_i2c.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_i2c.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ void acpi_i2c_register_devices(struct i2
        acpi_handle handle;
        acpi_status status;
 
-       handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&adapter->dev);
+       handle = ACPI_HANDLE(adapter->dev.parent);
        if (!handle)
                return;
 
Index: linux-pm/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
@@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ static int dw_i2c_probe(struct platform_
        adap->algo = &i2c_dw_algo;
        adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
        adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
-       ACPI_HANDLE_SET(&adap->dev, ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev));
 
        r = i2c_add_numbered_adapter(adap);
        if (r) {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to